The current code will both potentially print a WARN, and setup part of
the PPGTT structure. Neither of these harm the current code, it is
simply for clarity, and to perhaps prevent later bugs, or weird
debug messages.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index d772577..5ca8208 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -1063,11 +1063,14 @@ alloc:
goto alloc;
}
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (ppgtt->node.start < dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end)
DRM_DEBUG("Forced to use aperture for PDEs\n");
ppgtt->num_pd_entries = GEN6_PPGTT_PD_ENTRIES;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int gen6_ppgtt_allocate_page_tables(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt)
--
1.9.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
