On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yes no real backing storage is needed, but still the object should be >> allowed to get mapped into the GGTT, using the scratch page (already >> zeroed out). >> >> Is there a patch for a new drm/i915 ioctl similar to fallocate, which >> could be used here? > > Geez, you guys shouldn't just dump patches onto intel-gfx but read a bit > what other people are doing. Especially when they work for the same team > ;-) > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel/36351 Oops, I've mixed up names and you're not actually on the same team. Sorry about that. Still when you do upstream development please try to follow a bit what's happening in general so that we can maximally exploit opportunities for collaboration. That's why we have such a big emphasis on open discussion fora like mailing lists or irc channel. So I very much want people to jump into discussions of patches from other groups (or even outside from Intel) if they see some overlap (or other possible benefits like sharing learned lessons) with their own work. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
