On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: > On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression introduced after 3.14 > >>>>Egbert Eich (1): > >>>> drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order > >>Daniel, want me to pick that for -fixes? > >Yeah I geuss so. People never complained that the link isn't there, us > >adding it for one kernel release to the wrong place doesn't really sound > >too bothersome. > > > >But if this unbreaks a system somewhere then it makes sense to apply to > >-fixes. > > > >Knut, how exactly does your system blow up? > Well, it's only the warning generated at boot time that would irritate users. > As a patch is known and tested it's probably a good idea to fix it before > people complain to lkml and bugzilla. Ah, I didn't realize there's a warning, I've thought only the symlink goes the wrong way. In that case it's good to go for -fixes. Thanks for pointing this out. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
