On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:33:00AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:13:44PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > >> > ping > >> > >> Merged the first patch to topic/ppgtt, but punted on the 2nd - I think > >> with Mika's improvement to the guilty batch detection we should be able to > >> fix this better. Or what's the consensus here? > >> > >> Aside: I didn't spot your r-b burried way at the bottom of your mail, > >> hence why I didn't apply them. > >> -Daniel > >> > > > > What happened to this patch or its equivalent? > > I still think with the guilty detection we could just dump the > "interesting" ppgtt instead of all of them. Maybe poke Mika? Urm. Most of the time I contemplate patches to add all bound GTT objects as well i.e. there is a paucity of information here. (And currently *none* of value upstream. None.) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
