On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 20:02 -0600, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
It seems that the patch 01 is filter out.
So I will try to resend it again.
Thanks.
Yakui
> This follows Daniel's advice to add the two test cases based on multi drm_fd to
> test the ring sync and CPU<->GPU sync.
> The Broadwell GT3 machine has two independent BSD rings that can be used
> to process the video commands. This is implemented in kernel driver and transparent
> to the user-space. But we still need to check the ring sync and CPU<->GPU sync for
> the second BSD ring. Two tests are created based on the multi drm_fds to
> test the sync. Multi drm_fd can assure that the second BSD ring has the opportunity
> to dispatch the GPU command.
>
> V1->V2: Follow Daniel's comment to add one subtext instead of one individual
> test case, which is used to test the CPU<->GPU sync under multi BSD rings/
>
> V2->V3: Follow Imre's comment to remove the unnecessary initialization and
> use igt_assert_f instead of igt_assert
>
>
> Zhao Yakui (2):
> tests: Add one ring sync case based on multi drm_fd to test ring
> semaphore sync under multi BSD rings
> tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop: Add one subtest based on multi drm_fd to
> test CPU<->GPU sync under multi BSD rings
>
> tests/.gitignore | 1 +
> tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
> tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tests/gem_multi_bsd_sync_loop.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/gem_multi_bsd_sync_loop.c
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
