On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:35:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:14:41AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:54:06PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:42:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > [...] > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > > [...] > > > > @@ -502,6 +503,33 @@ static void drm_fb_helper_crtc_free(struct drm_fb_helper *helper) > > > > } > > > > > > > > /** > > > > + * drm_fb_helper_prepare - setup a drm_fb_helper structure > > > > + * @dev: DRM device > > > > + * @helper: driver-allocated fbdev helper structure to set up > > > > + * @funcs: pointer to structure of functions associate with this helper > > > > + * > > > > + * Sets up the bare minimum to make the framebuffer helper usable. This is > > > > + * useful to implement race-free initialization of the polling helpers. In > > > > + * that case a typical sequence would be: > > > > + * > > > > + * - call drm_fb_helper_prepare() > > > > + * - set dev->mode_config.funcs > > > > > > This step is done in drm_fb_helper_prepare already. > > > > drm_fb_helper_prepare() sets fb_helper->funcs. dev->mode_config.funcs > > needs to be set because it gets called by drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() > > which in turn is called by output_poll_execute(), which can be called at > > any point after drm_kms_helper_poll_init(). It could be scheduled > > immediately by drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(). > > > > I wonder if perhaps we should be wrapping that into a function as well. > > Currently this is only documented in code by the drivers that call this. > > But since it's only a single step it doesn't seem worth it. Perhaps if > > we rolled the min/max_width/height into that function as well it would > > be more worth it? That could be difficult to do since a couple of > > drivers need to set those depending on the chipset generation. > > Oh I've misread this step for the fb_helper->funcs assignment. Makes sense > and I don't think we need to augment your kerneldoc more to explain this. > > > > > + * - perform driver-specific setup > > Hm, maybe clarify this as "initialize modeset objects like crtcs, encoders > and connectors"? Since that's the important part we need to get done here. > > > > > + * - call drm_kms_helper_poll_init() > > > > > > Maybe mention that after this you can start to handle hpd events using the > > > probe helpers? > > > > Isn't that somewhat implied already? The poll helpers call directly the > > dev->mode_config.funcs->output_poll_changed() function, which has > > already been set up earlier. > > I've more meant that after this it's save for drivers to enable hpd > interrupts and start to process them. I.e. > > - enable interrupts and start processing hpd events > > as an additional step to make it really cleear how it all fits together. > Otherwise driver authors are left wondering wtf this isn't just one > function call to do it all for them ;-) > > > > > + * - call drm_fb_helper_init() > > > > + * - call drm_fb_helper_single_add_all_connectors() > > > > + * - call drm_fb_helper_initial_config() > > > > > > Does this list look sane in the generated DocBook? Afaik kerneldoc > > > unfortunately lacks any form of markup, at least afaik :( > > > > I must admit I didn't check. I'll make sure I do that before sending out > > the next version. > > If it looks ugly I'm ok as-is, just wondered. Kerneldoc is a bit > simplistic ime. In the second version I just sent out I ended up moving the description of this sequence into the fbdev helper section rather than keeping it in the description of the drm_fb_helper_prepare() function, since the new function is really just a part of the whole sequence, so it seemed to fit more nicely. And I've dropped the list formatting and turned it into prose instead. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpdCLc4cv703.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
