2014-04-11 6:02 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:52:26AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:04:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > > This reverts commit 4b28a1f3ef55a3b0b68dbab1fe6dbaf18e186710. >> > > >> > > This patch duct-tapes over some issue in the current bdw rps patches >> > > which must wait with enabling rc6/rps until the very first batch has >> > > been submitted by userspace. >> > > >> > > But those patches aren't merged yet, and for upstream we need to have >> > > an in-kernel emission of the very first batch. I shouldn't have >> > > merged this patch so let's revert it again. >> > >> > I said this on the mailing last before you merged the patch. >> >> 20140402050338.GB13824@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > 20140402145813.GV7225@phenom.ffwll.local will explain things. There's now a regression report pointing to the revert: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77565 . What is the proposed solution now? Just WARN and still avoid the infinite loop? Or keep the infinite loop and leave the bug open? Disable BDW runtime PM? Thanks, Paulo > > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
