On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:41:15PM +0530, deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In BDW, Apart from unmasking up/down threshold interrupts. we need
> to umask bit 32 of PM_INTRMASK to route interrupts to target via Display
> Interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index c2dd436..8c7841b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -5105,6 +5105,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
> #define GEN6_RC6p_THRESHOLD 0xA0BC
> #define GEN6_RC6pp_THRESHOLD 0xA0C0
> #define GEN6_PMINTRMSK 0xA168
> +#define GEN8_PMINTR_REDIRECT_TO_NON_DISP 0x7FFFFFFF
Defining is as (1<<31) would make more sense to me.
>
> #define GEN6_PMISR 0x44020
> #define GEN6_PMIMR 0x44024 /* rps_lock */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 27b64ab..6b123cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3066,6 +3066,8 @@ static u32 gen6_rps_pm_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv->dev)->gen <= 7 && !IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev))
> mask |= GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED;
>
> + mask &= GEN8_PMINTR_REDIRECT_TO_NON_DISP;
> +
> return ~mask;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
