On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:22:03 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > By mis-declaring this function, we ended up using software cursors > because the value seen by the caller was 0. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/sna/sna_display.c | 8 ++++++-- > src/sna/sna_display_fake.c | 3 ++- > src/uxa/intel_display.c | 7 +++++-- > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Only since http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=901fbfbbbd71c0d82080957f8ba09eebbc786f2b Which could probably have used a different name to avoid silent breakage. Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
