On 09.04.2014 17:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:59:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:37:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:16:30AM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Chris!
The intel xorg driver cursor code is broken, at least on my system.
The last good commit is 3810cff42bca1badc5844002694a6f582c0f423.
Hm, you mean
commit 25ca8f136cef9e1bdf06967bf8e78c87b54ffce2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 27 14:15:30 2014 +0000
sna: Support variable sized cursors
Iirc Chris already fixed this in latest git.
Ah, no. This is a phys cursor artifact. Special hardware, extra special
code.
Should be fixed with
commit dba43d370b984e262f6fe5920b38b433f4bd392b
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Apr 9 16:11:26 2014 +0100
Yes indeed. Thanks!
cu,
Knut
sna: Use pwrite to update physical cursors
Older hardware uses physical addresses for its cursor, which are
implemented by the kernel in an incoherent fashion. Maybe with stolen
support this would be different...
Fixes regression on [845g, 945g] from
commit 25ca8f136cef9e1bdf06967bf8e78c87b54ffce2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 27 14:15:30 2014 +0000
sna: Support variable sized cursors
Reported-by: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It just so happens that the older hardware I tested on (845g and pnv)
doesn't use physical cursors!
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
