On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:36:20PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:01:46PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > From: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > We need do forcewake before Disabling RC6, This is what the BIOS
> > expects while going into suspend.
> >
> > v2: updated commit message. (Daniel)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 04af065..ad2ff99 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3198,8 +3198,14 @@ static void valleyview_disable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >
> > + /* we're doing forcewake before Disabling RC6,
> > + * This what the BIOS expects when going into suspend */
> > + gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > +
> > I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0);
> >
> > + gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > +
> > gen6_disable_rps_interrupts(dev);
> > }
> >
>
> Isn't the forcewake done as part of I915_WRITE sufficient?
Writes don't do forcewake, nor is the register even part of the
VLV forcewake ranges.
I guess the rationale for this patche is still a bit vague. But if it's
really needed, I wonder whether we should do this same dance for !VLV
too? Do we have any "GPU stuck in wrong power state after suspend" type of
bugs still around?
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
