On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:36:10PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop > > the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expensive. > > > > v2: Use !IS_VALLEYVIEW instead of HAS_LLC as this is really > > about what the PTEs can represent. > > Add a comment clarifying the situation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
