On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:10:44 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:58:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:11:21PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > The computation of required framebuffer size in > > > > > > commit d978ef14456a38034f6c0e94a794129501f89200 > > > Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri Mar 7 08:57:51 2014 -0800 > > > > > > drm/i915: Wrap the preallocated BIOS framebuffer and preserve for KMS fbcon v12 > > > > > > is too optimistic, and would rely on the invariant fb being > > > reconstructed to exactly fit each pipe (and probably ignore hardware > > > limits). Instead, we want to compute the upper bound on what the display > > > engine will access and ensure that is within the inherited framebuffer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Ping. The code is just waiting to explode. > > I kinda hoped it would magically get reviewed by Jesse. Thanks for the > ping, patch is picked up for -fixes. Yeah sorry my brain exploded when looking at this for the nth time so I kept putting it off. Looks fine now though, so belated R-b from me. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
