At Tue, 1 Apr 2014 22:26:20 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:50:43PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 19:48 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:55:22PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > > During resume the intel hda audio driver depends on the i915 driver > > > > reinitializing the audio power domain. Since the order of calling the > > > > i915 resume handler wrt. that of the audio driver is not guaranteed, > > > > move the power domain reinitialization step to the resume_early > > > > handler. This is guaranteed to run before the resume handler of any > > > > other driver. > > > > > > > > The power domain initialization in turn requires us to enable the i915 > > > > pci device first, so move that part earlier too. > > > > > > > > Accordingly disabling of the i915 pci device should happen after the > > > > audio suspend handler ran. So move the disabling later from the i915 > > > > resume handler to the resume_late handler. > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > - move intel_uncore_sanitize/early_sanitize earlier too, so they don't > > > > get reordered wrt. intel_power_domains_init_hw() > > > > > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76152 > > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > So this is kinda why we should have gone with something proper, like a new > > > hdmi sink platform device created by i915 and registered as a driver by > > > snd-hda. Then the power domains stuff in the device core should take care > > > of these kinds of ordering issues. Or at least snd-hda can tell it that it > > > needs to wait for the hdmi-sink power domain to go on first before it can > > > resume, I'm not really fluent on the details here. > > > > > > And having a hdmi sink bus would allow us to throw all kinds of crap into > > > a clearly-defined interface, e.g. eld handling, hdcp synchronization, hpd > > > forwarding and all the other fun stuff. > > > > > > So not sure what I should do with this here now. > > > > Right, I'm not too happy about this solution either, so if anything it > > could be considered only a stop-gap fix. What you suggest seems to be a > > cleaner way but it'd require more time to investigate/implement at least > > on my part (but I'm ok to put it on my TODO list). > > We'd definitely need to discuss this with Takashi Iwai, since it would > only really be useful if it's good enough to solve the general pile of > sound/gfx coordination issues we have with hdmi. Adding him and alsa-dev. Yep, having a dedicated channel (hdmi sink bus or whatever) would be definitely a better way to go. OTOH, I agree that Imre's patch is needed for the upcoming kernel. The former implementation can't be finished so quickly for 3.15. I thought Mengdong started looking at (or working on) this, but haven't heard the progress yet. Mengdong, any news? thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
