On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:44:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:23:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Progess according to the deprecation plan laid out in > > > > commit b30324adaf8d2e5950a602bde63030d15a61826f > > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Nov 13 22:11:25 2013 +0100 > > > > drm/i915: Deprecated UMS support > > > > and disable UMS for 3.16. > > Please reiterate that it has been 5 years since the last userspace to > support UMS was released. Done > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > I agree that we should mark UMS as BROKEN, it no longer receives testing > and untested code is broken. I feel a it saddened as for those people > who still insist that UMS is better (usually because the BIOS breaks > something) should be left untouched. > > Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and merged the patch. I guess we'll figure out soon whether we need to back off on this since 3.14 (which is the first release with the deprecated UMS) is now out the door ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
