Re: [PATCH 00/13] Gen7 batch buffer command parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:46:37PM -0700, Volkin, Bradley D wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 06:15:36AM -0700, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > - Secure batch dispatch is still fubar.
> 
> I'm not sure that this will still impact us once we implement the batch copy
> step. I was only using the secure dispatch stuff because it was a convenient
> way to get the batch into GGTT. But with the copy step, we could just have
> separate code to do that.

The problem isn't copying or allocating the bo, the issue is running it
with
a) the hw checker disabled
b) not mapped into any ppgtt so hidden from all (unchecked) access and
c) otherwise working like a normal batch.

For that we need to employ the secure batch dispatch code in the execbuf
code. Atm b) is broken for aliasing ppgtt and c) is broken for full ppgtt.
So a bit of blockers for us. But at least broken b) with aliasing ppgtt is
kinda a regression, which means I'll get around to it soonish (before
3.15-rc1 at least).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux