On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think it's quite that easy, but I took it as a, "yes." Which one > is patch 3? "drm/i915: make semaphore signaller detection more robust" - it was a follow-up patch in this thread, hence no 3/3. If the relevant bits on bdw have moved out of the the cmd dword I guess we need to keep a cache of the relevant dword and supply it to the function. Was too lazy to check that though. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
