On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:43:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi Bradley - >> >> Apologies for my procrastination with the review; I don't easily recall >> as tedious a review as the command and register tables. And I sure have >> reviewed a lot of miserable stuff in the past. >> >> Most infuriatingly, I did not find a single real bug in the code! >> >> I think we'll need to automate some things going forward, for example >> listing the non-conforming length encoding with Damien's tools for cross >> checking. >> >> There are a few subtle points we need to discuss (separate mails >> internally) but all in all this series is: >> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Ok, pulled this one in, thanks a lot for the patches&review. I think it's > time we start to move on with the next bits, the batch copy stuff seams > like a suitable piece. There's still issues with launching the entire > thing in the end, but we can start with the copy infrastructure. > > Open issues I see still: > > - The littel issue we're discussing internally. Like I've said that one is > blocking us and needs to be resolved before we can switch to enforcing > mode. > > - Secure batch dispatch is still fubar. > > - CodingStyle says: Functions should be a) at most 3 indent levels b) at > most 3 ansi screens long (i.e. 75 lines). i915_parse_cmds violates both > metrics pretty deftly. I think a few refactoring patches to extract > helper functions and structure the flow a bit would be good. Just extracting the handlers for (desc->flags & CMD_DESC_REGISTER) and (desc->flags & CMD_DESC_BITMASK) would go a long way. BR, Jani. > > Cheers, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
