On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:13:17AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:08:00PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:57:42AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > static void gen6_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_device *dev, bool verbose)
> > > @@ -1838,14 +1841,11 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_device *dev, bool ver
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
> > > struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
> > > - struct i915_hw_ppgtt *pvt_ppgtt;
> > >
> > > - pvt_ppgtt = ctx_to_ppgtt(file_priv->private_default_ctx);
> > > seq_printf(m, "proc: %s\n",
> > > get_pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID)->comm);
> >
> > And
> > seq_printf(m, "\nproc: %s\n",
> > for good measure
> >
> > > - print_ppgtt(m, pvt_ppgtt, "Default context");
> > > - if (verbose)
> > > - idr_for_each(&file_priv->context_idr, per_file_ctx, m);
> > > + idr_for_each(&file_priv->context_idr, per_file_ctx,
> > > + (void *)((unsigned long)m | verbose));
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > --
>
> Thanks, I like it. I'm assuming you didn't want the count_pt_pages stuck
> in at this point (your diff was based on the end result)? I can do that
> if you prefer it. It seems pointless to me though.
Maybe pointless to you, but it helped me to know when they were fully
populated - without having to look back at the constants.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
