Re: [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915: Complete page table structures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:09:45AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:46PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Move the remaining members over to the new page table structures.
> > 
> > This can be squashed with the previous commit if desire. The reasoning
> > is the same as that patch. I simply felt it is easier to review if split.
> 
> I'm not liking the shorter names much. Is there precedence elsewhere
> (e.g. daddr)?
> -Chris
> 

I'm not particularly attached to "daddr." It was fun to say in my head.
A lot of code does use "daddr" but it seems to vary between "dma",
"device", data", "destination" Not exactly precedence.

Initially I had the prefix p[td]_daddr, but I thought you might complain
about it because it's implicit. dma_addr seemed kinda redundant to me.

Recommendation?

> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux