On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 20:08 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Because we merged the PC8 and runtime PM features, so calling
> intel_runtime_pm_get now has the same meaning, and we plan to just
> remove hsw_disable_package_c8 for this exact reason.
>
> My first patch tried to completely kill
> intel_aux_display_runtime_get/put, because I was assuming that whoever
> needed more than just runtime PM would have to get the appropriate
> power domain instead of that, but it seems some people still want the
> intel_aux_display_runtime_get abstraction, so keep it until someone
> else tries to replace it with the more-standard power domain calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 550491e..8df5f8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5888,15 +5888,14 @@ void intel_power_domains_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_power_domains_resume(dev_priv);
> }
>
> -/* Disables PC8 so we can use the GMBUS and DP AUX interrupts. */
> void intel_aux_display_runtime_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - hsw_disable_package_c8(dev_priv);
> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> }
>
> void intel_aux_display_runtime_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv);
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> }
>
> void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
