On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:41:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:31:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > This is a regression introduced in >> > >> > commit 0294ae7b44bba7ab0d4cef9a8736287f38bdb4fd >> > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Date: Thu Mar 13 12:00:29 2014 +0000 >> > >> > drm/i915: Consolidate forcewake resetting to a single function >> > >> > The reordered setup sequence ended up calling del_timer_sync before >> > the timer was set up correctly, resulting in endless hilarity when >> > loading the driver. >> > >> > Compared to Ben's patch (which moved around the setup_timer call to >> > sanitize_early) this moves the sanitize_early call around in the >> > driver load call. This way we avoid calling setup_timer again in the >> > resume code (where we also call sanitize_early). >> > >> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Tested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76242 >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 2 -- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 ++ >> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c >> > index e4d2b9f15ae2..9faee49f210d 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c >> > @@ -1608,8 +1608,6 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) >> > goto put_bridge; >> > } >> > >> > - intel_uncore_early_sanitize(dev); >> > - >> > /* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */ >> > intel_detect_pch(dev); >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > index e2e328d86aff..c3832d9270a6 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > @@ -736,6 +736,8 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_device *dev) >> > setup_timer(&dev_priv->uncore.force_wake_timer, >> > gen6_force_wake_timer, (unsigned long)dev_priv); >> > >> > + intel_uncore_early_sanitize(dev); >> > + >> > if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) { >> > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get = __vlv_force_wake_get; >> > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put = __vlv_force_wake_put; >> >> If you only want to setup_timer once, the setup_timer call should be in >> intel_uncore_init() which is the only one called only at load time. And >> of course, this is where the bug is. Otherwise, thaw calls >> uncore_early_sanitize, which will setup_timer again (which I thought was >> your complaint with my original patch). > > I don't think we want to stop checking for garbage in the forcewake > registers upon resume though? We still have a call to early_sanitize in i915_thaw, which should take care of this. My intention here was to only touch codepaths exclusively run at driver load time, and both i915_driver_load and uncore_init aren't used anywhere else. Or do I miss something and should wait for the morning coffee to kick in? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx