On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jani Nikula >> <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Fixes regression introduced by: >>>> commit b3064154dfd37deb386b1e459c54e1ca2460b3d5 >>>> Author: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Date: Tue Mar 4 00:42:44 2014 +0100 >>>> drm/i915: Don't just say it, actually force edp vdd >>> >>> Patrik, would you mind acking/testing this patch, as it blames your >>> commit for regressing? >> >> Testing will be hard I guess since it does the equivalent change >> Patrik has done to the pre-hsw dp code to the ddi hsw+ code. But a >> review would be nice - I've signed up Damien for this but he seems to >> be sick :( >> -Daniel > > Yes, as expected, this patch applied on top of -nightly is working fine. It's > the EDP_FORCE_VDD bit that is required for my Macbook Air 6,x. > > Is the proper fix for -fixes to completely revert: > dff392dbd258381a6c3164f38420593f2d291e3b Hi Patrik, I've done just that. Giving the drm-intel-fixes branch a spin would be great, if you don't mind me asking. BR, Jani. > > Tested-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks > Patrik -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
