On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:08:57AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:31 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 12:21 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_insert); > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_remove); > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_first); > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_next); > > > > I'd prefer to see EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for this. > > I'm fine with it either way. I think it would help if you stated the > reason for your preference though ? Nobody objects? How about v3: Prefer EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new library routines as the reason in the changelog for amending the patch? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
