On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My intent here was to allow a subtest which doesn't require the load helper to > run and pass even if the loader helper failed to initialize for whatever > reason. I'm fine if we'd rather avoid the complexity, but can we state that > decision more clearly in the commit message for future reference? The set of machines where pm_rps runs and the set where where the load helper init should succeed match. I agree the commit message is a bit sparse, but I've pushed it out already ;-) I'll try to be better next time around ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
