Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: No need to put forcewake after a reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:32:03PM +0200, mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need
>> to do explicit put after reset.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I've merged patches 2-4 from this series now too (patch 1 is already
> merged). But this one conflicts badly with Ville's patch, can you please
> respin?

Didn't find 4/5 from dinq so rebased 4 and 5 on top of dinq at:
1394035700-19630-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx

-Mika

> Thanks, Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux