Re: [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: get runtime PM at intel_set_mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Otherwise, when we run intel_modeset_check_state we may already be
> runtime suspended, and our state checking code will read registers
> while the device is suspended. This can only happen if your
> autosuspend_delay_ms is low (not the default 10s).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 10ec401..c64fb7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9746,13 +9746,18 @@ static int intel_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  			  struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>  			  int x, int y, struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
>  {
> +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
>  	ret = __intel_set_mode(crtc, mode, x, y, fb);
>  
>  	if (ret == 0)
>  		intel_modeset_check_state(crtc->dev);
>  
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);

I've thought our code has the relevant power domain checks sprinkled all
over the get_config/state functions already? If that's not the case I
prefer we fix that, similar to my suggestion in reply to Imre's patches of
moving the power domain checking into the callbacks.

Wrt -fixes: Since the default autosuspend delay will make it impossible to
hit this I think we can punt. Rules for late -rc and cc: stable is that it
needs to be a real-world problem with a real bug report.

And one more: To make pm_pc8 more useful, could we just set the
autosuspend delay to 0 while the test is running? Then restore it again
with an igt atexit handler. That should help with our coverage and hitting
this tiny little issues you've fixed in this series.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux