Hi Chris, Can you please through some light on the bug here, so that we're able to handle it. Is it about the handling required for the pread/pwrite ioctls, or is it about the format of mentioning the testcase? Thanks, Sourab -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 5:19 PM To: Gupta, Sourab Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vetter, Daniel; Barnes, Jesse; Wilson, Chris; Goel, Akash Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] drm/i915: Add the truncation logic for Stolen objects. On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 05:05:40PM +0530, sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> > > Adding the truncation logic for buffer objects with backing storage > from stolen memory. The objects will be truncated when user marks them > as purgeable and they are part of the inactive list. > > Testcase: igt/gem_stolen_mem This code still has the same obvious bugs. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
