Re: [PATCH .5/9] drm/i915: Move ppgtt_release out of the header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:47:06AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> At one time it was expected to be called in multiple places by kref_put.
> At the current time however, it is all contained within
> i915_gem_context.c.
> 
> This patch makes an upcoming required addition a bit nicer since it too
> doesn't need to be defined in a header file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'm ridiculously happy to see this get out of the header file, it should
never have been there.

Really.

*original reply heavily redacted*

;-)

Cheers, Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         | 36 ---------------------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 8c64831..57556fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2387,42 +2387,6 @@ static inline bool intel_enable_ppgtt(struct drm_device *dev, bool full)
>  		return HAS_ALIASING_PPGTT(dev);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void ppgtt_release(struct kref *kref)
> -{
> -	struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = container_of(kref, struct i915_hw_ppgtt, ref);
> -	struct drm_device *dev = ppgtt->base.dev;
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct i915_address_space *vm = &ppgtt->base;
> -
> -	if (ppgtt == dev_priv->mm.aliasing_ppgtt ||
> -	    (list_empty(&vm->active_list) && list_empty(&vm->inactive_list))) {
> -		ppgtt->base.cleanup(&ppgtt->base);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure vmas are unbound before we take down the drm_mm
> -	 *
> -	 * FIXME: Proper refcounting should take care of this, this shouldn't be
> -	 * needed at all.
> -	 */
> -	if (!list_empty(&vm->active_list)) {
> -		struct i915_vma *vma;
> -
> -		list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->active_list, mm_list)
> -			if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vma->vma_link) ||
> -				    list_is_singular(&vma->vma_link)))
> -				break;
> -
> -		i915_gem_evict_vm(&ppgtt->base, true);
> -	} else {
> -		i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
> -		i915_gem_evict_vm(&ppgtt->base, false);
> -	}
> -
> -	ppgtt->base.cleanup(&ppgtt->base);
> -}
> -
>  /* i915_gem_stolen.c */
>  int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev);
>  int i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(struct drm_device *dev, int size);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index f8c21a6..171a2ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,42 @@
>  static int do_switch(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>  		     struct i915_hw_context *to);
>  
> +static void ppgtt_release(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> +	struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = container_of(kref, struct i915_hw_ppgtt, ref);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = ppgtt->base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	struct i915_address_space *vm = &ppgtt->base;
> +
> +	if (ppgtt == dev_priv->mm.aliasing_ppgtt ||
> +	    (list_empty(&vm->active_list) && list_empty(&vm->inactive_list))) {
> +		ppgtt->base.cleanup(&ppgtt->base);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure vmas are unbound before we take down the drm_mm
> +	 *
> +	 * FIXME: Proper refcounting should take care of this, this shouldn't be
> +	 * needed at all.
> +	 */
> +	if (!list_empty(&vm->active_list)) {
> +		struct i915_vma *vma;
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->active_list, mm_list)
> +			if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vma->vma_link) ||
> +				    list_is_singular(&vma->vma_link)))
> +				break;
> +
> +		i915_gem_evict_vm(&ppgtt->base, true);
> +	} else {
> +		i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
> +		i915_gem_evict_vm(&ppgtt->base, false);
> +	}
> +
> +	ppgtt->base.cleanup(&ppgtt->base);
> +}
> +
>  static size_t get_context_alignment(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	if (IS_GEN6(dev))
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux