On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 13:52 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Because gen6_gt_force_wake_{get,put} should already be responsible for
> getting/putting runtime PM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 62d0c0915..2ec7b05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3597,7 +3597,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6)
> return 0;
>
> - intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -3612,7 +3611,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> return 0;
>
> gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>
> return 0;
> }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
