Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Add a partial instruction shootdown workaround on Broadwell.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:59:30PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > I believe this will be necessary on production hardware.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > I just realized tonight that my workarounds series never got merged.
> > 
> > After reviewing Ben and Chris's comments, I agree with all of them, so
> > I've dropped the unnecessary patches.  I also believe I shouldn't need
> > the pre-production workarounds I sent last time, so I've dropped those.
> > 
> > These two should apply to production hardware, so we probably want them.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index ad75ff7..f36d5e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -5050,6 +5050,9 @@
> >  #define   GEN7_SINGLE_SUBSCAN_DISPATCH_ENABLE	(1<<10)
> >  #define   GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE	(1<<3)
> >  
> > +#define GEN8_ROW_CHICKEN		0xe4f0
> > +#define   PARTIAL_INSTRUCTION_SHOOTDOWN_DISABLE	(1<<8)
> > +
> >  #define GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2		0xe4f4
> >  #define GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2_GT2		0xf4f4
> >  #define   DOP_CLOCK_GATING_DISABLE	(1<<0)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 4f01b04..df8ad21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -4838,6 +4838,10 @@ static void gen8_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	/* FIXME(BDW): Check all the w/a, some might only apply to
> >  	 * pre-production hw. */
> >  
> > +	/* WaDisablePartialInstShootdown */
> 
> +:bdw
> 
> Apart from that:
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

I think they're both stable material.
And:
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux