From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> Any power domain will require the HW to be in PCI D0 state, so just do the simple thing. Dear maintainer: since intel_display_power_put() and intel_display_power_get() are almost identical, git-am has failed to apply the patch on my local machine once: it added both chunks to put(), instead of one chunk to get() and another to put(). When you apply this patch to your tree, please check if it is correct. v2: - Add the warning above. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index d68fee2..772aa678 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -5341,6 +5341,8 @@ void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_device *dev, struct i915_power_well *power_well; int i; + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); + power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains; mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock); @@ -5372,6 +5374,8 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_device *dev, __intel_power_well_put(dev, power_well); mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock); + + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); } static struct i915_power_domains *hsw_pwr; -- 1.8.5.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
