On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:14:01PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> I am trying to understand your test case. >> Were you actually measure uncore_imc events at the time you suspended? > > No test case, just the machine booting; look at the printk timestamps. > >> I tried on my IvyBridge Lenovo and it works fine with 3.14-rc4+ >> (tip.git). I used: echo -n disk >/sys/power/state > > That's an x230 too, right? What I do is, I take linus/master, merge > tip/master, Matt's efi/next tree and my edac/for-next tree into it and > then boot that. No, it's a T430s. What happens if you boot vanilla tip.git? > > I don't think that the edac and efi trees interfere though. I'll do a > fresh merge of only current tip/master into linus/master to test hpa's > suggestion in the other mail. > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. > -- _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
