On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:51:11PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Now that we pass struct intel_crtc as an argument, we can check for
> DSI inside the function, removing one more of those confusing boolean
> arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 1e5ad04..b110da8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1745,14 +1745,12 @@ static void lpt_disable_pch_transcoder(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> /**
> * intel_enable_pipe - enable a pipe, asserting requirements
> * @crtc: crtc responsible for the pipe
> - * @dsi: output type is DSI
> * @wait_for_vblank: whether we should for a vblank or not after enabling it
> *
> * Enable @crtc's pipe, making sure that various hardware specific requirements
> * are met, if applicable, e.g. PLL enabled, LVDS pairs enabled, etc.
> */
> -static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - bool dsi, bool wait_for_vblank)
> +static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc, bool wait_for_vblank)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -1778,7 +1776,7 @@ static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> * need the check.
> */
> if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv->dev))
> - if (dsi)
> + if (intel_pipe_has_type(&crtc->base, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
I think shovelling an is_dsi flag into pipe_config would make a lot of
sense overall. Jani?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
