On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:41:08PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The WARN is a bit too verbose, make it a DRM_INFO that gets printed
>> once.
>>
>> While at it, fix the typo in DSLP.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> index 46d288055345..0fae017c4c7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,11 @@ static int swsci(struct drm_device *dev, u32 function, u32 parm, u32 *parm_out)
>> dslp = 50;
>> } else if (dslp > 1500) {
>> /* Hey bios, trust must be earned. */
>> - WARN_ONCE(1, "excessive driver sleep timeout (DSPL) %u\n", dslp);
>> + static bool warned;
>> + if (!warned) {
>> + DRM_INFO("excessive driver sleep timeout (DSLP) %u\n", dslp);
>> + warned = true;
>> + }
>
> This is the second "print once" thing I've seen in a few days. Seems
> like we should add DRM_INFO_ONCE() & co. to hide the ugliness a bit.
I'm adding DRM_INFO_ONCE() in the next version, but if you're referring
to
commit 53a4c6b26ddef1f2969f8bc17178bcda4782d18d
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jan 30 14:38:15 2014 +0000
drm/i915: Only print information for filing bug reports once
it's probably better to keep that as it is.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
