Both registers must be programmed for the Mode bit to be valid. DevIVB:GT2 ...
So I also agree ;)
Maybe you should improve the commit message now that we are sure, but anyway:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:06:05AM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> I agree that spec is strange, but following the spec correctly result
>> for this and next patch would be only this:
>>
>> if (IS_IVB_GT1(dev))
>> I915_WRITE(GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
>> _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE));
>> - else
>> I915_WRITE(GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1_GT2,
>> _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE));
>> }
>
> That would match what the w/a database says. But bspec says otherwise.
>
> But anyway Chris confirmed on his GT1 that GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1_GT2
> doesn't exist there, so I think these patches are correct.
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Ville Syrjälä
>> <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 03:32:08PM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> >> Your patch itself makes sense, but the registers values there are at i915_reg.h
>> >> differs from what I see at BSpec:
>> >>
>> >> #define GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2 0xe4f4
>> >> #define GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2_GT2 0xf4f4
>> >>
>> >> against
>> >> Address: 0E4F0h
>> >> Valid Projects: [DevIVB, EXCLUDE(DevIVB:GT2)]
>> >> Address: 0F4F0h
>> >> Valid Projects: [DevIVB:GT2]
>> >
>> > ROW_CHICKEN vs. ROW_CHICKEN2
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Also, I couldn't see the wa description at wa_database...
>> >> description was empty for me..
>> >
>> > Which one? WaDisableDopClockGating? It's not in the list for IVB,
>> > so in order to see it you need to pick another platform which
>> > includes this w/a.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:32 PM, <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> > IVB GT2 has two registers for these things, and both must be written.
>> >> >
>> >> > To add a bit more confusion both Bspec and the W/A database state that
>> >> > WaDisablePSDDualDispatchEnable is only needed for IVB GT1, but the W/A
>> >> > database also says to write even the second GT2 only register. So I
>> >> > don't really know what the right thing here is.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>> >> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> > index 6a1d98a..b268a55 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> > @@ -4828,9 +4828,13 @@ static void ivybridge_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
>> >> > if (IS_IVB_GT1(dev))
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
>> >> > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE));
>> >> > - else
>> >> > + else {
>> >> > + /* must write both registers */
>> >> > + I915_WRITE(GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
>> >> > + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE));
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1_GT2,
>> >> > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN7_PSD_SINGLE_PORT_DISPATCH_ENABLE));
>> >> > + }
>> >> >
>> >> > /* Apply the WaDisableRHWOOptimizationForRenderHang:ivb workaround. */
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
>> >> > @@ -4846,10 +4850,13 @@ static void ivybridge_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
>> >> > if (IS_IVB_GT1(dev))
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
>> >> > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(DOP_CLOCK_GATING_DISABLE));
>> >> > - else
>> >> > + else {
>> >> > + /* must write both registers */
>> >> > + I915_WRITE(GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
>> >> > + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(DOP_CLOCK_GATING_DISABLE));
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2_GT2,
>> >> > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(DOP_CLOCK_GATING_DISABLE));
>> >> > -
>> >> > + }
>> >> >
>> >> > /* WaForceL3Serialization:ivb */
>> >> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_L3SQCREG4, I915_READ(GEN7_L3SQCREG4) &
>> >> > --
>> >> > 1.8.3.2
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> >> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Rodrigo Vivi
>> >> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ville Syrjälä
>> > Intel OTC
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rodrigo Vivi
>> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
