On 1/29/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:02:56PM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
On 1/27/2014 10:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:35:06PM +0530, deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
When we enter RC6 and GFX Clocks are off, the voltage remains higher
than Vmin. When we try to set the freq to RPn, it might fail since the
Gfx clocks are down. So to fix this in Gfx idle, Bring the GFX clock up
and set the freq to RPn then move GFx down.
v2: remove vlv_update_rps_cur_delay function. Update commit message (Daniel)
v3: Fix the timeout during wait for gfx clock (Jesse)
v4: addressed comments on set freq and punit wait (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 242f540..feaa83b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -4944,6 +4944,10 @@
GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD | \
GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_TIMEOUT)
+#define VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG 0x130098
+#define VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT (1<<3)
+#define VLV_GFX_CLK_FORCE_ON_BIT (1<<2)
+
#define GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6_LOCKED 0x138104
#define VLV_COUNTER_CONTROL 0x138104
#define VLV_COUNT_RANGE_HIGH (1<<15)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index c6a07c9..84e20d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3035,6 +3035,56 @@ void gen6_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, u8 val)
trace_intel_gpu_freq_change(val * 50);
}
+/* vlv_set_rps_idle: Set the frequency to Rpn if Gfx clocks are down
+ *
+ * * If Gfx is Idle, then
+ * 1. Mask Turbo interrupts
+ * 2. Bring up Gfx clock
+ * 3. Change the freq to Rpn and wait till P-Unit updates freq
+ * 4. Clear the Force GFX CLK ON bit so that Gfx can down
+ * 5. Unmask Turbo interrupts
+*/
+static void vlv_set_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ /*
+ * When we are idle. Drop to min voltage state.
+ */
+
+ if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay <= dev_priv->rps.min_delay)
+ return;
+
+ /* Mask turbo interrupt so that they will not come in between */
+ I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0xffffffff);
+
+ /* Bring up the Gfx clock */
+ I915_WRITE(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG,
+ I915_READ(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG) |
+ VLV_GFX_CLK_FORCE_ON_BIT);
+
+ if (wait_for_atomic(((VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT &
Do we really need an atomic register busy loop here? Afaics this is only
called from process context, so the normal wait_for macro should be good
enough ...
-Daniel
I agree, the reason why i did the _atomic as we observed delay in
scheduling the wait_for and we ended up spending lot of time here.
I will wait for other comments, If i dont get any, I will address
this comment and submit the patch.
Now that we're using Chris' idle-clamping rps logic this would be run from
a work queue. So I hope that the potential scheduling delays here won't
affect things badly. If it does you can stick with the _atomic, but then
it needs a comment.
But I really hope that we only call this from worker threads, so shouldn't
matter too badly if there's a bit a scheduler delay.
-Daniel
I verified and we don't have a scheduling delays, I will change this to
_atomic to wait_for
-Deepak
+ I915_READ(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG)) != 0), 5)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("GFX_CLK_ON request timed out\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
+
+ if (wait_for_atomic(((vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_STS))
+ & GENFREQSTATUS) == 0, 5))
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("timed out waiting for Punit\n");
+
+ /* Release the Gfx clock */
+ I915_WRITE(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG,
+ I915_READ(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG) &
+ ~VLV_GFX_CLK_FORCE_ON_BIT);
+
+ /* Unmask Turbo interrupts */
+ I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, ~(GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS |
+ GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED));
+}
+
+
+
void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
@@ -3042,7 +3092,7 @@ void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
if (dev_priv->rps.enabled) {
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
- valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
+ vlv_set_rps_idle(dev_priv);
else
gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
@@ -4273,6 +4323,7 @@ void intel_gpu_ips_teardown(void)
i915_mch_dev = NULL;
spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
}
+
static void intel_init_emon(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
--
1.8.5.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
