Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Seek only one guilty batch per hanged ring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:20:30PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Instead of going through all the requests to find a batch that
> hanged the machine, use hangcheck score and the fact that
hung, hanged???
> first noncompleted request on hanged ring is, with great
> probability, the guilty one. This also ensure that we get one
> guilty batch per hang instead of possibly more (for each ring)
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73652
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         |   19 ++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         |    3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index d270351..27a97c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2322,20 +2322,17 @@ static bool i915_context_is_banned(const struct i915_ctx_hang_stats *hs)
>  
>  static void i915_set_reset_status(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>  				  struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
> -				  u32 acthd)
> +				  u32 acthd, const bool guilty)
>  {
>  	struct i915_ctx_hang_stats *hs = NULL;
> -	bool inside, guilty;
> +	bool inside;
>  	unsigned long offset = 0;
>  
> -	/* Innocent until proven guilty */
> -	guilty = false;
> -
>  	if (request->batch_obj)
>  		offset = i915_gem_obj_offset(request->batch_obj,
>  					     request_to_vm(request));
>  
> -	if (ring->hangcheck.action != HANGCHECK_WAIT &&
> +	if (guilty &&
>  	    i915_request_guilty(request, acthd, &inside)) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG("%s hung %s bo (0x%lx ctx %d) at 0x%x\n",
>  			  ring->name,
> @@ -2343,8 +2340,6 @@ static void i915_set_reset_status(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>  			  offset,
>  			  request->ctx ? request->ctx->id : 0,
>  			  acthd);
> -
> -		guilty = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* If contexts are disabled or this is the default context, use
> @@ -2383,12 +2378,18 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_ring_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	u32 completed_seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring, false);
>  	u32 acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> +	bool guilty = false;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(request, &ring->request_list, list) {
>  		if (i915_seqno_passed(completed_seqno, request->seqno))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		i915_set_reset_status(ring, request, acthd);
> +		if (!guilty && ring->hangcheck.score >= HANGCHECK_SCORE_GUILTY) {

checkpatch complains about the above.

> +			guilty = true;
> +			i915_set_reset_status(ring, request, acthd, true);
> +		} else {
> +			i915_set_reset_status(ring, request, acthd, false);
> +		}

I don't think the logic is correct. This will find the first request
(sequentially) that was hung, and not the first ring that hung.
Shouldn't we scan everything and take the first incomplete request with
the highest hangcheck.score?

Maybe I am crazy, but suppose we emit seqno 1 to ring X, and seqno 2 to
ring Y (the latter occurring after the first hang check)

event		RING X       RING Y
seqno 1 emit
seqno 2 emit	BUSY
		HUNG	      HUNG
		HUNG	      HUNG

The case here is somewhat academic since they both hung, but one might
argue that the first hang on ring Y is what caused the hang on ring X.

BTW, this change has convinced me that we really need to define
BUSY/KICK/HUNG as relative and not absolute values...

>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 6d11e25..e24f9ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2473,7 +2473,6 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
>  #define BUSY 1
>  #define KICK 5
>  #define HUNG 20
> -#define FIRE 30
>  
>  	if (!i915_enable_hangcheck)
>  		return;
> @@ -2557,7 +2556,7 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
>  	}
>  
>  	for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) {
> -		if (ring->hangcheck.score > FIRE) {
> +		if (ring->hangcheck.score >= HANGCHECK_SCORE_GUILTY) {
>  			DRM_INFO("%s on %s\n",
>  				 stuck[i] ? "stuck" : "no progress",
>  				 ring->name);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 71a73f4..6018793 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action {
>  	HANGCHECK_HUNG,
>  };
>  
> +#define HANGCHECK_SCORE_GUILTY 31
> +
>  struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
>  	bool deadlock;
>  	u32 seqno;

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux