From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx> The 'offset' field of the 'scatterlist' structure was wrongly programmed with the offset value from the base of stolen area, whereas this field indicates the offset from where the interested data starts within the first PAGE pointed to by 'scattterlist' structure. As a result when a new GEM object allocated from stolen area is mapped to GTT, it could lead to an overwrite of GTT entries as the page count calculation will go wrong, refer the function 'sg_page_count'. v2: Modified the commit message. (Chris) Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c index fed87ec..1a24e84 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ i915_pages_create_for_stolen(struct drm_device *dev, } sg = st->sgl; - sg->offset = offset; + sg->offset = 0; sg->length = size; sg_dma_address(sg) = (dma_addr_t)dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + offset; -- 1.8.5.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
