On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> From: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
>> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
>> parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
>> whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
>> This information helps us decide if seamless DRRS can be done
>> at runtime to support certain power saving features. This patch
>> was tested by setting necessary bit in VBT struct and merging
>> the new VBT with system BIOS so that we can read the value.
>
> What's the reason for the inconsistent intel_ tautology?
>
If you are referring to the names of members under bdb_driver_features,
which start with intel_, then this is something which can be modified to
remove the "intel_". Is it ok?
>> @@ -488,6 +508,9 @@ parse_driver_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>
>> if (driver->dual_frequency)
>> dev_priv->render_reclock_avail = true;
>> +
>> + dev_priv->vbt.intel_drrs_enabled = driver->intel_drrs_state;
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled : %d\n", driver->intel_drrs_state);
>
> Now this oddity needs a big explanation. Writing that will hopefully
> reveal a better strategy.
> -Chris
>
Panel vendors specify panel capabilities via the VBT. Following this,
the panel's capability to support seamless DRRS has to be read from the
VBT. The same is being done in the piece of code above. Without this we
cannot assume that the panel supports seamless DRRS.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
