On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:38:48AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:36:36PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > Merged this one here, not really sure what to do with the rest. So, apparently, there's some unhappiness with INTEL_INFO, which is somewhat understandable, it doesn't provide much more convenience than dev_priv->info. I can resend the series getting rid of INTEL_INFO() if the sentiment is shared. To provide the const safety, we can then declare the info struct as const in the private structure and cast it as non const at initialization time (as Ville suggests). -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
