On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Otherwise we don't kick out firmware framebuffers like vesafb and > efifb when CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV=n but CONFIG_FB=y. > > There's still the pesky issue with vgacon which we should somehow > replace with the dummy console at least. We have a similar issue at > module un/reload, since vgacon state is terminally botched after > i915.ko has loaded in modeset mode. But this gets us a step further at > least. > > Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c > index c9101bde96be..920b1c95fc18 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c > @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ void i915_master_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_master *master) > master->driver_priv = NULL; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV > +#if defined(CONFIG_FB) #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FB) if you want this to work for CONFIG_FB=m too. BR, Jani. > static void i915_kick_out_firmware_fb(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > struct apertures_struct *ap; > -- > 1.8.4.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx