On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:58:21PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:36:37PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > If we make sure that all the dev_priv->info usages are wrapped by > > INTEL_INFO(), we can easily modify the ->info field to be structure and > > not a pointer while keeping the const protection in the INTEL_INFO() > > macro. > > Yuck. Would Jani's suggestion to transmogrify INTEL_INFO() into a function make you happier? Or is it the back and forth from *dev_priv to *dev to dev_priv->info that is of utmost disgust? -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
