On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:54:42PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should gain > > balance by not doing irq_put > > > > "So the rule is: if you access unlocked values, you use ACCESS_ONCE(). > > You don't say "but it can't matter". Because you simply don't know." > > -- Linus > > > > v2: use local variable so it can't change during test (Chris) > > > > v3: update commit msg and use ACCESS_ONCE (Ville) > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
