On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:04:49PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 17:30 +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Don't touch DPFC_RECOMP_CTL on FBC2, use RMW to update > > the FBC_CONTROL on FBC1 to make it easier for people to > > experiment with different numbers. Also fix the interval > > mask for FBC1. > > As I understood the reason for removing DPFC_RECOMP support is that we > need to understand better how it affects performance etc. before > enabling it. That's something for the future. > > We could still zero that register in case BIOS leaves there something > else but that can be done as a follow-up too. So: > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> This patch here doesn't really apply on dinq. Ville, can you pls resend? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
