Re: [PATCH 2/3] tests/gem_close_race: Adapt the test for Full PPGTT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:22:36PM +0000, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > This test hasn't been terribly effective at provoking the bug it tries
> > > to hit, so I think we can just unconditionally use the lower limit.
> > > That also helps with the really long runtime of this case a bit.
> > > -Daniel
> 
> Understood. I´ll simplify the patch and send it again then.
>  
> > FWIW, all 3 of these patches, or their equivalents were in the branch I sent in
> > my cover letter.
> 
> I saw your series and I thought that I better send these patches over, but I missed that point in your cover letter, sorry :(
> How should we do it, then? will Daniel take them directly from your branch?
> 
> -- Oscar

You're fine. Use these when support is merged. My point to Daniel was
reiterating that this was tested on the patches I've submitted. (though
not with the identical patches).



-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux