On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yeah, this is definitely very useful. But I'd just print it by default >> so that we don't need to ask for this information. Of course we need >> to be careful to not print it when listing subtest. Also: >> - We don't have any init stuff for simple testcases without subtests, >> we need to roll out a bit of infrastructure to make that happen. >> - Shell script tests might also benefit from this. >> - uname information needs to be gathered at runtime, since QA has a >> special build server. >> >> If you don't mind I'll apply this and then frob it some more. >> -Daniel > > Sounds great. I want to test it out on some of the BDW bugs QA is > reporting, so ping me when you're done. Done, with the exception of replicating the same information for shell scripts. Not sure whether the duplication is worth it. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
