On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We had problems with the Intel backlight driver the last time we tried > this, so let's push this through their tree for testing first? Cc:ed > intel-gfx and Daniel Vetter. Makes sense imo. Or if I just get a branch with just those patches (it can rebase, I don't really care) I could pull it into our drm-intel-nightly integration tree, which is what everyone is testing anyway. -Daniel > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:03:57AM +0800, AceLan Kao wrote: >> The native/vendor backlight control interface is hardly fail to control the >> brightness, and we had encountered many backlight issues result from the broken >> ACPI backlight interface, so I think we should promote the native backlight >> control interface and use it by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c >> index 995e91b..b3032f8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c >> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ module_param(allow_duplicates, bool, 0644); >> * For Windows 8 systems: if set ture and the GPU driver has >> * registered a backlight interface, skip registering ACPI video's. >> */ >> -static bool use_native_backlight = false; >> +static bool use_native_backlight = true; >> module_param(use_native_backlight, bool, 0644); >> >> static int register_count; >> -- >> 1.8.3.2 >> >> > -- > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
