Inspired by the recent pile of tests for the CS, which doesn't split up the tests into per-ring subtests. Cc: bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> --- tests/NAMING-CONVENTION | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION index f08e2828022a..8fc6548db067 100644 --- a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION +++ b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION @@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ machine isn't configured properly there should be a first subtest to just check for that. ctx: Tests that exercise the hw context support. + +render/blt/bsd/vebox: Tests which apply to individual rings should use these +suffixes. They're a bit inconsistent and historically grown, but they new Bspec +names (RCS, BCS, VCS and VECS) aren't really clearer. -- 1.8.1.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
