On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:12:13PM -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > I don't know what else you'd propose? Pass an X visual in the ioctl? > An EGL config? This is our name space, we can add stuff as we need > (as Keith is doing here). include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h is the > canonical source for these values and we should add > DRM_FORMAT_SARGB8888 there to make sure we don't clash. Well that's kinda the problem. If you don't expect the kernel to clash with whatever mesa is using internally then we should add it to the kernel, first. That's kinda what Dave's recent rant has all been about. The other issue was that originally the idea behind fourcc was to have one formate namespace shared between drm, v4l and whomever else cares. If people are happy to drop that idea on the floor I won't shed a single tear. In the end I'll expect that someone will make a funny collision between all the different projects anyway, so meh. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
